Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Why I will Probably Vote for Romney

The fact that in November I will probably vote for Romney will probably surprise anyone who's read any of my political posts.

My reason for voting the way that I do differs from most Americans. I don't believe that the actual choice in President matters--at the end of the day it's Congress that gets things passed or not passed, independently of what the President says or wants. I look at the office of the President as being a way to motivate the non-political to get off their butts and care. Granted, this idea of mine is dependent on the polarization currently destroying our country, but I believe that the office of the President can also be used to close the gaps between ideologies.

I voted for Obama not because I was particularly impressed by his ideology, but because I didn't like the way McCain was so pro-war and because if we didn't reform Wall Street and Big Business we'd end up in the same economic situation again--the bailout was a necessary evil because the failure of regulation made money stop flowing. But more importantly, Obama seemed like he was playing a pivotal roll in American politics. He was getting the younger generation interested in politics and motivating the growing complacent older generation to stand up and say that they didn't want their children and grandchildren's liberalness to govern them. I voted for Obama because I knew in my gut that if he won, something big was going to happen in America. And I was right. The Tea Party was born just a couple months after his election.

American's (and really all humans) are largely governed by what they think not necessarily what is truth. I haven't done the research, but it seems obvious to me that many of those fears about a Democratic President that we heard about during the election and since haven't come to pass. Talking with my grandmother yesterday was interesting. She's opposed to mandating healthcare because it will put more people on Medicaid, even though the only difference between the current system and a system with more people on Medicaid is that people not currently with any sort of insurance only go to the hospital when they're dying (or think that they're dying) and if they had some form of insurance, they'd see a doctor for their once a year check-up and find things before their a major problem. Okay--and some government official might change the tax code to move the money you're paying the insurance company to subsidize the hospital's ability to take non-insured individuals to the Treasury to fund Medicaid, but really this would be just a technicality. THAT would be the worst case senario where nothing changes. The best case senario (and what is most likely) would be that health care costs would go down since instead of spending tens of thousands of dollars on recovery from a massive heart attack, we could spend $10 a month on Lipitor pills. And yes--I mean we. Most of the money you pay in insurance goes to hospitals so that they can treat individuals who don't have insurance. But I digress.

I will vote for Romney because if he wins, the middle class might finally be convinced that tax breaks for the rich aren't in their best interests. UhhhhhhG. Shoot. Dammit. I'm sorry. My logic is faulty. The middle class won't learn anything because as soon as Romney wins the election, businesses will know that all taxes will be reduced and you will see a sudden upsweep in spending in their sector...spending that was cut when a Democrat took office not because he was actually going to tax their businesses, but because he was going to implement fair taxes to help cut the deficit--taking money not spent hiring people (money spent on Lamborginis (not an American made car) that were destroyed 3 months later). And laws trying to keep the mega-rich from putting their money into Swiss bank accounts. And reforms that would keep Wall Street from selling bad loans. When Romney takes office, business will once again rule our country.

I predict that the major battles in Congress will be about passing necessary reforms. They will be blocked by well paid lobbyists and nothing will change. Oh, you don't know about the power of Lobbyists to stop common sense reforms? Watch the video below.

Watch The Meth Epidemic on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

Friday, May 11, 2012

Did Obama "Flip-Flop" on Gay Marriage?

No, I don't think so. I went through the same change of mindset recently. One of my regrets is that I didn't vote with my gut back in 2006 when I got my first chance to vote. The question of marriage was on our ballot and we were given four definitions to choose from. I flip-flopped between whether I believe in civil unions or full-blown marriage (semantics, I know). I decided to go the civil union route because of those semantics--I left the word marriage to the church so long as gay people got the same rights. Which, is what Obama believed before yesterday.

But since the "one man, one woman" definition passed, it's obvious that if we really want to change the laws, we're going to have to throw semantics out the window. I still believe that the Churches can keep their marriages as they want, but those of us who split the "marriage" (whatever word you want to use) need to unite under one or the other. The end-goal is equal rights for whatever couple stands in front of a certified person for the 20 minute ceremony, so does it really matter what we call it?

Obama came to his current position the same way I did. We wanted to play politics and religion and call it  a civil union to keep the right wing happy (wow, I sound so jaded when I say it that way), but that hasn't worked. Supporting Gay Marriage is just a name to unite more people. Civil Union people, please don't think that we're crazy. I'm sure that there's a small number of people who will take nothing except the term marriage, but there's what, 46 states where even Civil Unions don't exist? And the vast majority of supporters, whatever word they use, just want a single piece of paper to be able to sign that gives them all the rights and privileges they could get with a small fortune and six months of legal chaos.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Senator Tom Coburn

You can't imagine my irritation that Coburn went on Jon Stewart to chat and happened to mention his preference that congress raise taxes on the super-rich. Apparently the senator is as conservative as they come and yet, he has no problem seeing the tax rate go back to what it was 50 years ago.

Yes, I know, I should be thrilled. Why aren't I? Because the stupid worm isn't running for office in 2012. Why is it that politicians only say things that will help the country when they're no longer pandering for votes?! It almost makes me like Biden for being so honestly inept. Biden has to be the epitome of how the right candidate can out-shine even the worst running mate.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Redundancies?

Obama is going to try to shrink government by getting rid of redundancies such as the Commerce Department. I'm sure even the least governmentally informed of this country know about Rick Perry's gaffe when he forgot the names of the departments he would end, so now that Obama is going to attempt such a feat, shouldn't he be happy? I haven't heard any replies, except from the collective that is the Republican Party, that says that Obama's only doing it because the Republican's wanted to first (yes, the is of course a stupid reason to do anything...sarcasm). I personally think that this is the best way for Obama to win the re-election--take everything on the Republicans' platforms and attempt to do them. If he can get them completed, then American's will like him. If he can't get them passed, then he proves that they are impossible promises and also makes congress look even more ineffective (if a Democratic President can't get Republican ideas passed in a split congress, then how could a Republican get the same laws passed?). It's a win-win situation.

Sorry for how dippy this sounds--I'm fuzzy headed today--stupid cold. I guess I should go back to melting crayons (got a Crayola Crayon Maker for Christmas)--not too much thinking in that.