Monday, February 28, 2011

To what extent...

is continuing to get pregnant when you know you'll have a miscarriage abortion? I just watched The Time Traveler's Wife and I wanted to smack the main girl. While I understand that an abhorrent number of pregnancies end in miscarriage, to willingly continue to try to have children is in my mind equivalent to willfully causing the death of that many unborn children. You should know by now that I'm pro-choice yet anti-abortion--so I'm as much against conceiving a child you know will more than likely die before birth as I am for not making it illegal (if that makes sense).

One might argue that in one case God is choosing for the death of the child and in the other man is choosing, but I say that in both cases man is at fault--God did not make man blind to the fact that 100% of the pregnancies are ending pre-maturely--by ignoring the facts you are willfully choosing to kill a fetus.

I'm curious to know the number of God-fearing Christian women who choose some permanent form of contraception because they know that any pregnancy would just result in miscarriage, since most religions are against such things.

Judging People

I try really hard not to judge people, but there are a couple things that just can't escape my notice. The first is a guy in a suit who tosses his tie over his shoulder while he eats to keep from spilling something on it. Yeah...sorry bud, but I judge you.

The second is anyone over the age of 25 who doesn't have a clue about what's going on in the world. It's really not hard to watch the 30 minute world news or pick up a newspaper or spend 30 minutes on some news site...trust me, no one's life is so busy that they can't spend 30 minutes a day learning about what's going on in the rest of the world. Farmville really isn't that important. This is why anyone who's friends with me on Facebook gets bombarded with links to news articles that I've been reading. I look at it as my little mission in the world to show uninterested young adults that there's more to the world than petty drama.

[End Rant]

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Stamps

I go through a lot of stamps in a month--I love writing snail mail. I don't much mind the prices, but if I had my way, out of country postage would cost exactly twice as much as domestic postage. It would make my life so much easier.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

McCarthyism on Biggest Loser

You've probably read my take on McCarthyism before. I never thought that I'd find an example on The Biggest Loser, but this weeks Valentine's Day episode is exactly that. The person who won the temptation was kept secret (oh, he decided to tell everyone)--you heard at least one person pick out who they thought was the "Communist" who we, the viewers, knew was innocent.

Still stupid choice, bud. My favorite temptation was last season when the guy won by eating one M&M because everyone put the weight-loss above the game.

Citizenship

A person born of foreign parents on American soil (be it continental, territorial, military base or military ship) is a naturalize born American citizen. A person born of at least one American parent on foreign soil is not? This seems silly to me.

Friday, February 4, 2011

Radio Commercials

For some reason, the conservative radio station in Charlottesville, VA has been following me for the past 3 years. In my 2nd year, the music station I had my alarm clock set to suddenly became the talk show. It didn't annoy me, so I left it. Then I decided that I wanted music, so I changed to another music station. On Jan 1st, guess what showed up again? I left it, again, because it isn't too bad. Except for the chosen commercials, which is what I'm here to talk about.

It's amazing what type of commercials I hear on this station. The one that prompted me to write this is about a website that they advertised for. It's apparently about the predictions some guy made about the end of America. When you watch the video, he will show you how he accurately predicted the fall of "Fannie and Freddie" and a couple of those banks after the housing collapse, to convince you that he knows when the end of America will be. I HAVE NOT YET WATCHED THE VIDEO. So, saying that, I'm going to make my own predictions about the video. You should believe me because I predicted that the housing market would collapse when I was 16 years old. I admit I was slightly off. In my predictions, I said that the market would collapse somewhere around my freshman year of college, then would rebound and I was hoping that by the time I graduated from college the market would still be weak so that I could get a decent house for cheap. My predictions were wrong because I didn't know that the fall was going to be that steep or that the banking market was so tragically linked to the housing market--all my observations came from the fact that housing prices were going out of control--I didn't know why they got so high so quickly.

My predictions about the video are that it will be vague. I also believe that it will be in some way propaganda. So my predictions aren't so vague I will risk being specific: it will have to do with governmental actions. I'm not sure if this will be from causing ultimate warfare or if it will be from internal misdeeds. I'll probably be wrong with this prediction, but at least I'm not vague. Now I'll go to the website and see how I did. I'll probably only make it through about 2 minutes of the video.

OH! I forgot. I'm sure that there will be advertisements on the site. When a person decides to put advertisements on their website they get paid for hosting those advertisements--yes, that's why I have advertisements on my blog--if people are going to read this then I might as well make a buck or two. But I'm not forcing people to come here. I'm not advertising propaganda on the radio to scare people into checking the website. Whether from fear or curiosity, I'm sure that after that that commercial aired a lot of people went to the website. And I'm sure a lot of them are the type to click on any advertisements they see: especially if those advertisements are for other "end of America" stuff. It's convenient that whoever made the video will be making a tidy sum of money from it.

Now I'll go check out that video.

Huh. Well, I WAS wrong. The page is actually a very plain. The "video" isn't even really a video, but the animation of a letter written by a guy in an investment bank. He says that he did predict the collapse of all those banks accurately, but doesn't have proof. He claims that what's going to tear down the country is that he says he sees the same issues he saw in those collapsing banks in the U.S. Treasury and that all of America's savings are going to be wiped out.

Want to know MY problem with this analysis? Life is a self-fulfilling prophesy, especially in banks. If you say there's going to be a run on the bank, there WILL be a run on the bank as everyone who hears it wants to get their money out first. So, this guy's prediction can be fulfilled just because enough people believe him.

I went back to the letter to scroll through it (when you try to leave it takes you to a written out version of the letter, much better--it's HUGE) there are facts and figures, but I think you should take them with a grain of salt. Here's why: when you get to the end of the letter, he wants you to purchase a $50 subscription (normally $99--HE'S SAVING YOU MONEY!!) to hear more. He wants to talk you into profiting off of the problems with the economy. So, all those cushy figures showing the rising cost of copper and cotton? Well, he wants you to get into the market--which will artificially raise the prices. So, you can bet that anyone who's heard of this guy in the past 10 years...crap. I just looked at the x-axis scale on his gold and silver scale--it starts in year 2000. His commodity figure is only 2 years old. Biased?!? Yeah, totally. How about we look at a 100 year figure--so we can see the comparison to what was going on before the Great Depression.

If this guy was actually trying to make money responsibly, and if he did care about saving America, he wouldn't be making awareness this way. If he has a problem with the way the U.S. Treasury is being run, he should go to them and do whatever in his power (or outside his power) to FIX IT. But no, he wants you to buy his product (so he's guaranteed to make money) to teach you how to invest your money--which you could lose since that's the way of investments. My conclusion: it's a scam. Could he be right about the U.S. Treasury? Maybe. But getting into the commodities market will drive up the prices of the actual commodity. If you buy a barrel of crude oil for $100 and sell it for $150, then yeah, you make $50, but you also will lose that money when you go to the gas pump and it now costs you the added amount for the price of the crude oil used to make the gas. And it hurts everyone around you even more because they didn't make that $50. Can your conscience handle that?

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

If I had money...

I would probably invest in stock. Contrary to what might be popular belief, I like stock. I think that stock, used properly is a great investment strategy. But what's been done recently with stock is not, I believe, socially acceptable.

In my perfect world, stock would only be bought and sold by the individual companies. The physical stock market can exist, but there wouldn't be the middle man mutual funds. When a person buys stock in their companies, they would choose those companies based on their own personal values, not because that's the most popular stock on Tuesday.

Supposing that I had an extra $1000 lying around, this is what I would do. I would research all my favorite companies and decide which one I support the most. It would have to be one which is located in the US and which gets all or most of it's raw goods from the US. No, I'm not geo-phobic (is that even a word? If not, my definition is a person afraid of a global economy); I just believe that my money should promote job growth in my country of residence because more jobs in-country means a better economy which means that in 5 years when I might need a new job there will be one available. Ideally, my company of choice would be a global company, hiring people in multiple countries and using those countries source material. But anyway, after choosing my company, I base my wanted rate of return on their statistics. For example, let's say that I want to earn 10%. So, I will leave my $1000 worth of stock alone until it hits that 10% growth at which time I will decide whether to "let it ride" or sell off $100 worth of stock, so that I still only have my initial $1000 investment at risk. Hmm...my math may be off...I was never good at these problems in accounting, which is why I was rejected from the Comm School. In any case, seeing as how I know I made money (whatever the amount) and I know that I'm willing to risk losing all of my initial $1000 investment, the actual amounts don't mean much to me.

My only rules, since ethics are most important in my stock choices, are that I will refuse to invest in the housing market (outside of buying a home to live in). Everyone needs a place to live--I REFUSE to artificially buoy prices to make a quick buck. I also refuse to dally in the goods market (beef, gold, wood, OIL, COAL,...any source material) because again, these are things that artificially raise prices. I also would choose to instantly sell my stock for whatever the price is, if my company does something that I find to be unethical. For example: I refuse to invest in Wal-Mart because I do not agree with it's hiring practices. I believe that for as much money they make in a year, they should be able to offer some kind of insurance to their employees, even if it's the most rudimentary.